ADA compliance means making your website usable by people with disabilities — including those who are blind, deaf, have motor impairments, or have cognitive disabilities — under the Americans with Disabilities Act. In practice, this means your website must conform to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA standard, which is the benchmark courts and regulators use to evaluate compliance.
This is not optional. Over 4,000 ADA web accessibility lawsuits were filed in the United States in 2024 alone. The Department of Justice has formally confirmed that websites qualify as “places of public accommodation” under Title III of the ADA. And the April 2026 deadline for government website compliance signals where private-sector enforcement is heading next.
This guide covers everything you need to understand and act on: what the law actually requires, how WCAG works, the fifteen most critical fixes for any website, why accessibility overlay widgets are making the problem worse, real lawsuit data, Canadian accessibility law comparisons, and a step-by-step remediation roadmap you can start today.
What the ADA Actually Requires
The Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law in 1990 to prohibit discrimination against people with disabilities. It is divided into five titles, each covering a different area of public life.
The Five Titles of the ADA
- Title I — Employment: Prohibits discrimination in hiring, promotion, and workplace accommodations.
- Title II — State and Local Government: Requires government services, programs, and activities to be accessible, including websites.
- Title III — Public Accommodations: Requires businesses open to the public to be accessible. This is the title that applies to most commercial websites.
- Title IV — Telecommunications: Requires telephone and internet companies to provide relay services.
- Title V — Miscellaneous: Covers technical provisions, relationship to other laws, and retaliation protections.
Title II vs Title III: Which Applies to You?
Title II applies to state and local government entities — city websites, public university portals, DMV systems, public transit apps. In April 2024, the Department of Justice published a final rule explicitly requiring government websites to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA.
Title III applies to private businesses that are “places of public accommodation.” This includes restaurants, hotels, retail stores, healthcare providers, banks, law firms, and virtually any business with a public-facing website. While Title III does not explicitly mention websites, the DOJ has consistently interpreted it to cover digital properties, and federal courts — including the First, Second, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits — have upheld this interpretation.
Governments with populations of 50,000 or more must make their websites WCAG 2.1 AA compliant by April 24, 2026. Smaller entities have until April 26, 2027. While this deadline applies to government sites, it sets the precedent for private-sector expectations. For a deep dive on the deadline’s implications for private businesses, read our post on what the April 2026 ADA deadline means for your business.
Who Must Comply (and the Myths)
A common misconception is that ADA web compliance only applies to large corporations or government agencies. This is false. The ADA applies to all businesses that serve the public, regardless of size, revenue, or industry. A five-person law firm with a brochure website has the same legal obligation as Amazon.
Another myth: that you only need an accessible website if you sell products online. Courts have ruled that even informational websites — those that simply describe your business, list your services, or provide directions to your physical location — must be accessible because they function as an extension of your place of public accommodation.
A third myth: that compliance is only required if you have disabled customers. The ADA is a proactive law. You must be accessible before someone with a disability tries to use your website, not after they file a complaint.
WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 — The Technical Standard
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) are published by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and define the technical requirements for accessible web content. WCAG is not law itself — it is the standard that courts, regulators, and accessibility professionals reference when evaluating whether a website is compliant.
The Four POUR Principles
Every WCAG requirement falls under one of four principles:
- Perceivable: Information must be presentable in ways users can perceive. This means providing text alternatives for images, captions for video, and sufficient color contrast. A blind user relying on a screen reader cannot perceive an image without alt text.
- Operable: Interface components must be operable by all users. Every function must work with a keyboard alone — no mouse required. Links must have visible focus indicators. Users must have enough time to read and interact with content.
- Understandable: Content must be readable and predictable. Forms must provide clear labels and error messages. Navigation must be consistent across pages. The page language must be declared in the HTML.
- Robust: Content must be compatible with current and future assistive technologies. This means using semantic HTML, valid markup, and proper ARIA attributes where native elements are insufficient.
Conformance Levels: A, AA, and AAA
WCAG defines three levels of conformance:
- Level A — the bare minimum. Covers the most basic requirements like alt text for images and keyboard operability. Meeting only Level A leaves significant accessibility gaps.
- Level AA — the standard. This is the level that courts, regulators, and the DOJ reference for ADA compliance. It adds requirements for color contrast, text resizing, consistent navigation, and form error identification. This is your target.
- Level AAA — the gold standard. Adds requirements like sign language interpretation for video, enhanced contrast ratios, and extended audio descriptions. Most organizations do not target full AAA conformance, but implementing select AAA criteria where practical is a best practice.
WCAG 2.1 vs 2.2: What Changed
| Feature | WCAG 2.1 (2018) | WCAG 2.2 (2023) |
|---|---|---|
| Success Criteria | 78 total | 87 total (9 new) |
| Mobile Accessibility | Added touch, orientation, and motion criteria | Further improved with target size and dragging alternatives |
| Cognitive Accessibility | Basic reading and navigation requirements | Added consistent help, redundant entry, and accessible authentication |
| Target Size | AAA only (44×44px) | AA minimum of 24×24px added |
| Focus Appearance | Focus must be visible | Minimum focus indicator size and contrast defined |
| Legal Benchmark | Current DOJ and court standard | Emerging standard; expect adoption by 2027 |
WCAG 3.0 is in draft and will eventually replace 2.x. It introduces a new scoring model, broader disability coverage, and testing methodologies that account for user experience rather than just pass/fail criteria. A stable recommendation is not expected before 2028. For now, target WCAG 2.1 AA and begin adopting 2.2 criteria proactively.
The 15 Most Critical Website Accessibility Fixes
These fifteen issues account for the vast majority of accessibility barriers on the web. Fix these and you address roughly 80% of the problems that real users encounter and that auditors flag.
1. Add Alt Text to Every Image
Screen readers announce images by reading their alt attribute. Without alt text, a blind user hears “image” or nothing at all. Decorative images should use an empty alt="" to be skipped entirely.
<!-- Bad -->
<img src="team-photo.jpg">
<!-- Good -->
<img src="team-photo.jpg" alt="The Grow Wild team at our Vancouver office">
<!-- Decorative image -->
<img src="divider-line.svg" alt="" role="presentation">
2. Ensure Full Keyboard Navigation
Every interactive element — links, buttons, forms, menus, modals — must be operable using only a keyboard. Users who cannot use a mouse rely on Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter, Space, Escape, and arrow keys to navigate. Test by unplugging your mouse and navigating your entire site.
3. Meet Color Contrast Ratios
Normal text (under 18px) requires a 4.5:1 contrast ratio against its background. Large text (18px bold or 24px regular) requires 3:1. Light gray text on white backgrounds is the single most common contrast failure on the web.
<!-- Fails: #999 on #fff = 2.85:1 -->
<p style="color: #999">This text fails contrast.</p>
<!-- Passes: #595959 on #fff = 7:1 -->
<p style="color: #595959">This text passes contrast.</p>
4. Use Proper Heading Hierarchy
Headings (<h1> through <h6>) create a document outline that screen reader users navigate like a table of contents. Never skip heading levels (for example, jumping from <h2> to <h4>). Use only one <h1> per page. Do not use headings purely for visual styling.
5. Label All Form Inputs
Every form field must have a visible <label> element programmatically associated with the input via for and id attributes. Placeholder text is not a substitute for labels — it disappears when users begin typing and is not reliably announced by all screen readers.
<!-- Bad: placeholder as label -->
<input type="email" placeholder="Your email">
<!-- Good: proper label -->
<label for="email">Email address</label>
<input type="email" id="email" name="email" autocomplete="email">
6. Provide Captions and Audio Descriptions for Video
Pre-recorded video must have synchronized captions for deaf and hard-of-hearing users. Audio descriptions (a narration track describing visual content) are required for blind users. Auto-generated captions are a start, but they must be reviewed and corrected for accuracy.
7. Use Semantic HTML Structure
Use <nav> for navigation, <main> for primary content, <header> and <footer> for their respective purposes, <article> for self-contained content, and <section> for thematic groupings. These landmarks allow screen reader users to jump directly to the content they need instead of tabbing through every element.
8. Add a Skip Navigation Link
The first focusable element on every page should be a “Skip to main content” link that jumps past the navigation. Without it, keyboard users must tab through every navigation link on every page before reaching the content.
<body>
<a href="#main-content" class="skip-link">Skip to main content</a>
<header>...navigation...</header>
<main id="main-content">...content...</main>
</body>
9. Make Focus Indicators Visible
When a user tabs to an interactive element, that element must have a clearly visible focus indicator — typically an outline. Never use outline: none without providing an alternative focus style. WCAG 2.2 adds specific requirements for focus indicator size and contrast.
10. Implement Accessible Error Handling
Form validation errors must be identified in text (not just by color), associated with the field that caused the error, and announced to screen readers. The error message should describe the problem and suggest how to fix it.
11. Use Descriptive Link Text
Links must make sense out of context. Screen reader users often navigate by listing all links on a page. “Click here” and “Read more” are meaningless without surrounding text. Write links that describe the destination: “View our case studies” or “Download the accessibility checklist.”
12. Size Touch Targets Appropriately
Interactive elements must be large enough to tap accurately. WCAG 2.2 Level AA requires a minimum target size of 24×24 CSS pixels. Best practice (AAA) is 44×44px. Small links, close buttons, and icon-only buttons are frequent offenders.
13. Do Not Use Color Alone to Convey Information
If you use red to indicate an error, you must also use an icon, text, or pattern. Approximately 8% of men and 0.5% of women have some form of color vision deficiency. A red asterisk alone to mark required fields fails this criterion.
14. Make Dynamic Content Accessible
Content that updates dynamically — live search results, shopping cart totals, notification banners, chat widgets — must be announced to screen readers using ARIA live regions (aria-live="polite" or aria-live="assertive"). Without this, screen reader users never learn that content has changed.
15. Ensure Accessible Documents
PDFs, Word documents, and spreadsheets linked from your website must also be accessible. This means tagged PDFs with proper reading order, alt text on embedded images, and table headers. If you cannot make a PDF accessible, provide the same content in an accessible HTML alternative.
Why Accessibility Overlays Will Not Protect Your Business
Accessibility overlays are JavaScript widgets — typically a toolbar icon in the corner of a website — that claim to make websites ADA compliant automatically. Companies like accessiBe, AudioEye, UserWay, and EqualWeb market these products as quick, affordable alternatives to manual remediation. They do not work, and they are making the problem worse.
The FTC’s $1 Million Fine Against accessiBe
In April 2025, the Federal Trade Commission fined accessiBe $1 million for deceptive marketing practices. The FTC found that accessiBe’s claims of automated ADA compliance were “false and unsubstantiated.” The company had marketed its AI-powered overlay as a solution that could make any website fully compliant within 48 hours. Independent testing consistently showed that accessiBe-equipped sites still contained dozens of accessibility barriers.
Overlays Are Named in Lawsuits
Rather than preventing lawsuits, overlays are increasingly cited as evidence of insufficient effort. Data from accessibility litigation tracking shows that over 25% of ADA web accessibility lawsuits in 2024 targeted websites using overlay products. Plaintiff attorneys have described overlays as “low-hanging fruit” because they demonstrate that a business was aware of its accessibility obligations but chose a shortcut instead of genuine remediation.
Using an overlay may increase your lawsuit risk, not decrease it. If you currently have an overlay installed, the safest course of action is to remove it and invest in source-code remediation.
Why Overlays Fail Technically
- AI cannot infer intent. An overlay can detect that an image lacks alt text, but it cannot determine what the image depicts. AI-generated alt text is frequently inaccurate, generic, or misleading.
- Overlays cannot fix source code. They add a JavaScript layer on top of broken HTML. The underlying accessibility problems remain, and screen readers interact with the source code, not the overlay.
- They create new barriers. Overlay widgets can interfere with existing assistive technology settings, override user preferences, and introduce keyboard traps where none existed before.
- They fail on dynamic content. Single-page applications, JavaScript-rendered content, and client-side routing are invisible to overlay scripts that run on initial page load.
The Professional Consensus
The disability community and accessibility professionals have been unequivocal: overlays are harmful. The National Federation of the Blind has publicly opposed overlay products. The American Bankers Association has warned member institutions against relying on overlays. Over 700 accessibility professionals have signed an open letter opposing overlay products at overlayfactsheet.com.
What to Do If You Currently Use an Overlay
- Remove the overlay script from your website immediately.
- Run a manual accessibility audit to identify actual barriers.
- Prioritize fixes by severity (critical barriers first).
- Fix issues in your source code, not with a JavaScript Band-Aid.
- Test with real assistive technology (screen readers, keyboard navigation).
ADA Web Accessibility Lawsuits in 2025–2026
ADA web accessibility litigation has grown steadily over the past decade and shows no signs of slowing. Understanding the data helps you assess your own risk and justify the investment in proper remediation.
The Numbers
- 4,000+ lawsuits were filed in the United States in 2024 alone.
- This represents a 15% year-over-year increase from 2023.
- New York and California account for approximately 80% of all filings.
- The average time from demand letter to settlement is 4–8 months.
- 95%+ of cases settle out of court — they rarely go to trial.
Industries Most Targeted
| Industry | Share of Lawsuits | Common Issues |
|---|---|---|
| E-commerce & Retail | ~35% | Missing alt text, inaccessible product filters, checkout barriers |
| Food & Hospitality | ~15% | Menu PDFs, reservation systems, location finders |
| Healthcare | ~12% | Patient portals, appointment scheduling, forms |
| Financial Services | ~10% | Account dashboards, loan applications, calculators |
| Education | ~8% | Course materials, LMS platforms, application forms |
| Real Estate | ~7% | Property search, virtual tours, contact forms |
| Professional Services | ~6% | Brochure sites, team bios, blog content |
| Other | ~7% | Varied |
The Real Cost of Non-Compliance
A lawsuit is not just a settlement payment. The total cost includes:
- Legal fees: $10,000–$50,000+ for defense, even if you settle.
- Settlement payment: $25,000–$100,000+ depending on the scope and plaintiff’s demands.
- Remediation costs: You still have to fix the site after settling, typically under court-mandated timelines.
- Monitoring agreement: Many settlements require ongoing accessibility monitoring for 2–3 years at $500–$2,000 per month.
- Repeat litigation: Serial plaintiffs can file again if issues recur. About 20% of defendants are sued more than once.
- Reputation damage: Lawsuits become public record. Clients, partners, and prospects will find them.
A proactive accessibility audit and remediation typically costs $3,000–$50,000 depending on site complexity. The average lawsuit costs $50,000–$150,000+ in total when you add legal fees, settlement, and mandatory remediation. Proactive compliance is three to five times cheaper than reactive litigation.
How to Reduce Your Risk
- Fix the obvious issues now. The fifteen fixes listed above address the most commonly cited violations.
- Publish an accessibility statement. A genuine statement that acknowledges your commitment, describes your current conformance level, and provides a contact for reporting issues demonstrates good faith.
- Document your efforts. Keep records of audits, fixes, and testing. Courts view documented, ongoing effort favorably — even if your site is not yet perfect.
- Respond to demand letters promptly. Many cases escalate because businesses ignore the initial letter. A prompt, good-faith response can often resolve the matter before litigation.
- Engage a professional. An accessibility-focused ADA web design and accessibility partner can identify and fix issues faster than internal teams who lack accessibility expertise.
If You Are in Canada
Canada has its own accessibility legislation at both the federal and provincial levels. If your business operates in Canada — or serves Canadian customers from the United States — you need to understand these requirements alongside the ADA.
Accessible Canada Act (Federal)
The Accessible Canada Act (ACA) came into force in 2019. It applies to federally regulated organizations including banks, telecommunications companies, transportation providers, and the federal government itself. The ACA requires these organizations to identify, remove, and prevent accessibility barriers across their operations — including digital content. Regulations are still being developed, but WCAG 2.1 AA is the expected standard.
Accessible British Columbia Act
British Columbia passed its accessibility legislation in 2021 with the Accessible British Columbia Act. The province is developing specific accessibility standards for areas including information and communications technology. While detailed web accessibility standards are still being finalized, businesses in BC should prepare by targeting WCAG 2.1 AA. For Vancouver-based businesses, proactive compliance positions you ahead of enforcement.
AODA (Ontario)
Ontario’s Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) is the most mature provincial framework. Since January 2021, all organizations with 50+ employees in Ontario must make their websites and web content conform to WCAG 2.0 Level AA. Non-compliance can result in fines of up to $100,000 per day for corporations.
ADA vs Canadian Law: Comparison
| Feature | ADA (United States) | ACA (Canada Federal) | AODA (Ontario) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | All public accommodations | Federally regulated orgs | Ontario orgs with 50+ employees |
| Web Standard | WCAG 2.1 AA (court standard) | WCAG 2.1 AA (expected) | WCAG 2.0 AA (mandated) |
| Enforcement | Private lawsuits + DOJ action | Accessibility Commissioner | Provincial fines |
| Penalties | Settlements + injunctive relief | Administrative penalties (TBD) | Up to $100,000/day for corps |
| Private Right of Action | Yes | No (currently) | No |
| Explicit Web Mandate | DOJ guidance + court precedent | Forthcoming regulations | Yes, since 2014 |
If your business operates in both Canada and the United States, achieving WCAG 2.1 Level AA satisfies the technical requirements of both the ADA and Canadian frameworks. Build once, comply everywhere.
How to Make Your Website Accessible: The Remediation Roadmap
Accessibility remediation is not a one-time project — it is an ongoing practice. But it starts with a structured process. Here is the six-step roadmap we use with our clients.
Step 1: Run a Comprehensive Audit
Start with automated testing tools — axe DevTools, WAVE, or Google Lighthouse — to identify the low-hanging fruit. Automated tools catch approximately 30–40% of accessibility issues. The remaining 60–70% require manual testing.
Your manual audit should include:
- Keyboard-only navigation through every page and interactive element.
- Screen reader testing (VoiceOver on Mac, NVDA on Windows) on key user journeys.
- Color contrast verification using a tool like the WebAIM Contrast Checker.
- Heading structure analysis to verify proper hierarchy.
- Form testing to verify labels, error handling, and validation messages.
Step 2: Prioritize by Severity and Impact
Not all issues are equal. Prioritize using this framework:
- Critical (fix immediately): Barriers that prevent users from accessing core functionality — no keyboard navigation, missing form labels on checkout, no alt text on primary content images.
- High (fix within 30 days): Issues that significantly degrade the experience — insufficient contrast on body text, missing skip navigation, focus traps in modals.
- Medium (fix within 90 days): Issues that create friction but do not block access — decorative images missing
alt="", inconsistent heading levels in blog posts, missing language attributes on foreign-language content. - Low (fix within 6 months): Enhancements that improve the experience — ARIA landmark refinements, enhanced touch target sizes, improved error message specificity.
Step 3: Fix the Source Code
Accessibility fixes must be made in the source code, not through overlays or workarounds. This means working directly in your CMS templates, theme files, component libraries, and page content. Common areas that need attention:
- HTML templates (heading structure, semantic elements, landmark roles)
- CSS (contrast, focus indicators, visibility, responsive behavior)
- JavaScript (keyboard event handlers, ARIA state management, focus management)
- CMS content (alt text, heading usage, link text, table markup)
- Third-party widgets (chatbots, analytics overlays, cookie banners, embedded forms)
Step 4: Test with Assistive Technology
After fixes are implemented, test again. The most reliable testing involves:
- Screen readers: VoiceOver (Mac/iOS), NVDA (Windows, free), JAWS (Windows, paid). Test the top three to five user journeys.
- Keyboard only: Can you complete every task without a mouse? Is the focus indicator always visible?
- Zoom to 200%: Does content reflow without horizontal scrolling? Are touch targets still reachable?
- Browser extensions: axe DevTools and WAVE for automated re-verification.
Step 5: Publish an Accessibility Statement
An accessibility statement is a public declaration of your commitment to accessibility. It should include:
- Your conformance target (e.g., WCAG 2.1 Level AA).
- Known limitations or areas still being remediated.
- A contact method for reporting accessibility barriers (email, phone, or form).
- The date the statement was last reviewed.
This statement serves both as a good-faith signal to regulators and as a practical resource for users who encounter barriers. It does not need to be long — clarity and honesty matter more than length.
Step 6: Establish Ongoing Monitoring
Accessibility is not a one-time checkbox. New content, design updates, third-party widget changes, and CMS upgrades can all introduce new barriers. Ongoing monitoring should include:
- Automated scanning: Run weekly or monthly scans using tools like axe Monitor, Siteimprove, or Deque.
- Manual spot checks: Test new pages and features before they launch.
- Training: Ensure content editors understand alt text, heading hierarchy, and link text best practices.
- Quarterly reviews: Audit a sample of pages each quarter to catch regression.
Grow Wild Agency is a Vancouver-based digital marketing agency specializing in SEO, web development, and AI search optimization. We help businesses build websites that are fast, accessible, and discoverable — by search engines, AI models, and every user who visits. Get in touch.
Certified Expertise
Our team is trained in the same federal accessibility frameworks we help you implement. These certifications are from GSA Section508.gov and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
Section 508 Compliance
- Section 508: What Is It and Why Is It Important?
- Procuring Section 508 Conformant ICT Products and Services
- Micro-Purchases and Section 508 Requirements
- Soliciting and Evaluating Accessibility Conformance Reports in Federal ICT Procurement
Accessible Document Authoring
- Authoring Accessible Microsoft Word Documents
- Procuring Section 508 Conformant Products
View all 17 certifications including Customer Experience and Usability Testing credentials.
Frequently Asked Questions
If your business is open to the public (a “place of public accommodation” under Title III of the ADA), courts have increasingly ruled that your website must also be accessible. This includes virtually every business with a website — retail, hospitality, healthcare, financial services, and professional services. While the ADA does not explicitly mention websites, the Department of Justice has confirmed that websites are covered, and thousands of lawsuits have been filed on this basis.
You face three main risks: a demand letter or lawsuit (average settlement $25,000–$100,000+), regulatory action from the Department of Justice, and loss of customers who cannot use your site. Over 4,000 ADA web accessibility lawsuits were filed in the United States in 2024 alone, and the trend is accelerating.
No. The ADA applies to all businesses that serve the public, regardless of size. A small business with five employees and a simple website has the same legal obligation as a Fortune 500 company. The difference is that small businesses are actually targeted more frequently by serial plaintiffs because they are less likely to fight back.
The ADA is a civil rights law that requires accessibility. WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) is the technical standard that defines how to achieve it. Think of the ADA as the “what” (your website must be accessible) and WCAG as the “how” (specific success criteria to meet). Courts and regulators reference WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the benchmark for ADA compliance.
No. Accessibility overlays — toolbar widgets from companies like accessiBe, AudioEye, and UserWay — do not make websites compliant. The FTC fined accessiBe $1 million in April 2025 for deceptive practices. Over 25% of ADA lawsuits now target websites that use overlays. The National Federation of the Blind, the American Bankers Association, and over 700 accessibility professionals have formally opposed overlay products.
In April 2024, the Department of Justice published a final rule under Title II of the ADA requiring state and local government websites to conform to WCAG 2.1 Level AA. Governments with populations of 50,000 or more must comply by April 24, 2026. Smaller entities have until April 26, 2027. While this rule applies to government websites specifically, it signals the direction for private-sector enforcement as well.
Start with automated tools like axe DevTools, WAVE, or Google Lighthouse — they catch about 30–40% of accessibility issues. Then test manually: navigate the entire site using only a keyboard, run a screen reader (NVDA on Windows, VoiceOver on Mac), check color contrast ratios, and verify all forms and interactive elements are operable without a mouse.
Yes. Many accessibility best practices directly improve SEO performance. Proper heading hierarchy helps search engines understand page structure. Alt text on images creates additional indexable content. Semantic HTML improves crawlability. Fast page loads (required for accessibility) are a confirmed ranking factor. Sites that fix accessibility issues typically see a 15–30% improvement in organic traffic within six months.
Canada has three overlapping accessibility frameworks: the federal Accessible Canada Act (ACA), British Columbia’s Accessible British Columbia Act, and Ontario’s AODA. All reference WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the standard. If your business operates across Canada and the United States, you must comply with both Canadian and American requirements — though in practice, achieving WCAG 2.1 AA satisfies both.
Costs vary significantly based on site complexity. A simple 10–20 page business website typically costs $3,000–$10,000 for a full accessibility remediation. E-commerce sites with hundreds of pages range from $15,000–$50,000+. Enterprise sites can exceed $100,000. Ongoing monitoring and maintenance typically runs $500–$2,000 per month. Compare this to the average lawsuit settlement of $25,000–$100,000.
Section 508 applies specifically to federal agencies and organizations that receive federal funding — it requires their electronic and information technology to be accessible. The ADA is broader, applying to all public accommodations and commercial facilities. If you are a private business, the ADA is your primary obligation. If you receive federal contracts or funding, you must also comply with Section 508.
Physical accessibility (ramps, elevators, braille signage) and digital accessibility (website compliance) are separate requirements under the ADA but both fall under the same law. Having an accessible physical location does not exempt you from making your website accessible, and vice versa. Courts have consistently held that Title III’s public accommodation requirements extend to digital properties.
Ready to Make Your Website Accessible?
We help businesses achieve genuine ADA compliance through source-code remediation — not overlay shortcuts. Get a free accessibility audit to find out where your site stands.
Get a Free Accessibility Audit